It became apparent that we had out ran our current tape drives ability to keep up with the load. Having attached storage helped the issues, but even then doing duplicate tape jobs during the day took forever and always required tape switching, which was doubled during the verify stage in BackupExec 10d. The two tape drives were an HP DAT72 and a DAT40.
It has finally become an issue since our new finance software spits out transaction logs and backup files all over the place. I needed a less than painful way to get the data backed up and off site. So I investigated the pricing on LTO drives. I was surprised to see the price drops since I looked into in the past. I settled on this:
http://www.cdwg.com/shop/products/d…aspx?EDC=960327
I got it in this morning and wasted no time getting it installed in the server and running a duplicate job. It backed up 120 gigs, including the verify stage in less than a few hours. While that might not be amazing speed, it’s worlds ahead of what I had been using. I can probably get all my data on one tape and still have time to kill before the backup to disk jobs get run at night.
I have got pf running on an OpenBSD 4.0 box right now. I’m using it as our firewall for our web based services sans for one, which I plan on moving this weekend. After which, I’ll continue to clamp down using scrubbing and more finite rule sets. Finally, I’ll add another box into the mix and make small pf cluster using carp/pfsync. But, so far so good. I find pf a whole lot less cumbersome than BorderManager in terms of configuration. Jumping around in filtcfg.nlm can get messy really quick. I still plan to use BorderManager for our outbound http proxy requirements. It’s still a great product. I’ll be upgrading to 3.9 when it’s released.